Author Topic: Just what does 'Organic' mean?  (Read 11468 times)

Offline misfitguy

  • Administrator
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2006
  • Posts: 584
    • Misfits Central
Just what does 'Organic' mean?
« on: July 03, 2009, 09:33:31 AM »
I have attached a part of an article and also the URL of the complete article concerning Organic labeling.  It is a must read for those concerned with what is found in their food stores.  Read it and demand administration changes to your Congresspersons and Senators.  Please.

Mick

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31719136/ns/health-more_health_news//

Federal ‘organic’ label’s integrity under fire
Consumers who pay up to twice as much don’t always get what they expect

By Kimberly Kindy and Lyndsey Layton
Washington Post
updated 5:20 a.m. ET, Fri., July 3, 2009


WASHINGTON - Three years ago, U.S. Department of Agriculture employees determined that synthetic additives in organic baby formula violated federal standards and should be banned from a product carrying the federal organic label. Today the same additives, purported to boost brainpower and vision, can be found in 90 percent of organic baby formula.

The government's turnaround, from prohibition to permission, came after a USDA program manager was lobbied by the formula makers and overruled her staff. That decision and others by a handful of USDA employees, along with an advisory board's approval of a growing list of non-organic ingredients, have helped numerous companies win a coveted green-and-white "USDA Organic" seal on an array of products.

Grated organic cheese, for example, contains wood starch to prevent clumping. Organic beer can be made from non-organic hops. Organic mock duck contains a synthetic ingredient that gives it an authentic, stringy texture.

Relaxation of the federal standards, and an explosion of consumer demand, have helped push the organics market into a $23 billion-a-year business, the fastest growing segment of the food industry. Half of the country's adults say they buy organic food often or sometimes, according to a survey last year by the Harvard School of Public Health.

Expanding market
But the USDA program's shortcomings mean that consumers, who at times must pay twice as much for organic products, are not always getting what they expect: foods without pesticides and other chemicals, produced in a way that is gentle to the environment.

The market's expansion is fueling tension over whether the federal program should be governed by a strict interpretation of "organic" or broadened to include more products by allowing trace elements of non-organic substances. The argument is not over whether the non-organics pose a health threat, but whether they weaken the integrity of the federal organic label.

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack has pledged to protect the label, even as he acknowledged the pressure to lower standards to let more products in.

In response to complaints, the USDA inspector general's office has widened an investigation of whether products carrying the label meet national standards. The probe is also looking into the department's oversight of private certifiers who are hired by farmers and food producers and inspect products to determine whether they can use the label.

Some consumer groups and members of Congress say they worry that the program's lax standards are undermining the federal program and the law itself.

"It will unravel everything we've done if the standards can no longer be trusted," said Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.), who sponsored the federal organics legislation. "If we don't protect the brand, the organic label, the program is finished. It could disappear overnight."

Organic advocates and food marketing experts said the introduction this month of new "natural" products by an organics division of Dean Foods is the latest sign that the value of the USDA label has eroded. The yogurt and milk products will be distributed under the Horizon label and marketed as a lower-priced alternative to organic products.

Congress adopted the organics law after farmers and consumers demanded uniform standards for produce, dairy and meat. The law banned synthetics, pesticides and genetic engineering from foods that would bear a federal organic label. It also required annual testing for pesticides. And it was aimed at preventing producers from falsely claiming their foods were organic.

Corporate firepower
The USDA created the National Organic Program in 2002 to implement the law. By then, major food companies had bought up most small, independent organic companies. Kraft Foods, for example, owns Boca Foods. Kellogg owns Morningstar Farms, and Coca-Cola owns 40 percent of Honest Tea, maker of the organic beverage favored by President Obama.

That corporate firepower has added to pressure on the government to expand the definition of what is organic, in part because processed foods offered by big industry often require ingredients, additives or processing agents that either do not exist in organic form or are not available in large enough quantities for mass production.

Under the original organics law, 5 percent of a USDA-certified organic product can consist of non-organic substances, provided they are approved by the National Organic Standards Board. That list has grown from 77 to 245 substances since it was created in 2002. Companies must appeal to the board every five years to keep a substance on the list, explaining why an organic alternative has not been found. The goal was to shrink the list over time, but only one item has been removed so far.

The original law's mandate for annual pesticide testing was also never implemented — the agency left that optional.

From the beginning, farmers and consumer advocates were concerned about safeguarding the organic label. In 2003, Arthur Harvey, who grows organic blueberries in Maine, successfully sued the USDA, arguing that the fledgling National Organic Program had violated federal law by allowing synthetic additives.

"The big boys like Kraft realized they could really cash in by filling the shelves with products with the organics seal," Harvey said. "But they were sort of inhibited by the original law that said no synthetic ingredients."

His victory was short-lived. The Organic Trade Association, which represents corporations such as Kraft, Dole and Dean Foods, lobbied for and received language in a 2006 appropriations bill allowing certain synthetic food substances in the preparation, processing and packaging of organic foods, creating conditions for a flood of processed organic foods.

Tom Harding, a Pennsylvania-based consultant for small local farmers and big producers, including Kraft, said that broadening the law has helped meet demand by multiplying the number of organic products and greatly expanded the amount of agricultural land that is being managed organically.

"We don't want to eliminate anyone who wants to be a part of the organic community," Harding said. "The growth we've seen has helped the entire organic food chain."

(Continued here)  http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31719136/ns/health-more_health_news//

This is why we don't buy organic.  I once was a serious organic gardener in the 70's and I haven't seen the care that "Organic gardening" suggests in the large corporate farms.  It is simply being used today as a marketing tool to increase prices and profits accordingly.  Read page three comments of the article from a certifier of organic foods and my point here will be made.

Mick


« Last Edit: July 03, 2009, 09:37:53 AM by misfitguy »
Go to www.misfitscentral.net  Why not?

Military justice is to justice what military music is to music.

~Groucho Marx

"The world is one country and mankind is its citizens..."  Baha'u'llah

Offline EdisonBoy

  • Purple Maple Syruple
  • *
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 49
Re: Just what does 'Organic' mean?
« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2009, 04:05:17 AM »
Yes!

The corporate lobbyists are all up in our food industry with what used to be called bribes, but in 1976 the Supreme Court ruled that using money to get access to public officials is protected free speech.  That's why de facto "We the People" are no longer in charge and our government is being run as if corporate interests come first.  And we can't call it bribery any more because if we do we might get hit with a SLAPP (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_lawsuit_against_public_participation) lawsuit.

That's what happened to Oprah in Texas in the 90s, except that she was rich enough not to be intimidated.  It's not that easy with us "little people."

Offline Smokebender

  • Half Mile Marker
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 771
  • Don't need no stinkin permit. Just back off.
    • Michigan Bigfoot Group
Re: Just what does 'Organic' mean?
« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2009, 09:55:42 PM »
The only way to be sure you have organic food is to grow your own.   :)
The time of the lone wolf is over. Gather yourselves!
We are the ones we've been waiting for.
A Hopi elder speaks.

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/michiganbigfootgroup/  Just click it now! Then get back here right away or I'm tellin Mom.

 

sir-individual